Pharma Competitive Intelligence Services

TODO: Hero description — target pharma strategy, BD, and commercial teams. What problem do they have and how does Inflection Labs solve it?

Sample Report

TNF-α Competitive Intelligence: Q1 2026

Executive Summary

Key Events by Therapeutic Class

Directly TNF-α-Targeted Therapies

  • XPro1595 (INmune Bio): FDA End-of-Phase 2 meeting confirmed regulatory alignment on an integrated Phase 2b/3 registration pathway in early Alzheimer's disease, with CDR-SB as the sole primary endpoint, inflammation-based biomarker enrichment accepted, and approximately 1,000-participant program design cleared with no objection.[1]
  • NAV-240 (Navigator Medicines): FDA IND clearance received for a Phase 2a trial of the OX40L/TNF-α bispecific antibody in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa, with dosing initiated Q1 2026.[11]
  • NAV-242 (Navigator Medicines): Australian HREC approval received for the Phase 1 first-in-human program of the next-generation half-life-extended OX40L/TNF-α bispecific antibody, with SAD results expected Q4 2026.[11]
  • SOR102 (Sorriso Pharma): Phase 1 first-in-human data published for the oral bispecific anti-TNF/IL-23 antibody, demonstrating 43–56% clinical response rates at day 42 in UC patients versus 17% for placebo.[7]
  • Adalimumab (AbbVie): The ADVISE trial demonstrated superiority over conventional immunosuppression for corticosteroid sparing at 6 months (69% vs. 54%; p=0.029) and corticosteroid discontinuation at 12 months (55% vs. 40%; p=0.028) in non-infectious uveitis.[2]
  • Infliximab / Adalimumab (J&J / AbbVie): Post-hoc analysis of 300 UC patients from HIBISCUS I/II and GARDENIA found anti-TNF therapy drives a proximal-to-distal colonic healing pattern, and combined MES + PRO2 endpoint outperformed PRO2 alone (28.6% vs. 13.3%; p=0.006).[8]
  • Certolizumab Pegol (UCB): Post-hoc analysis of 930 RA patients from the REALISTIC trial confirmed that high rheumatoid factor levels (≥180 kU/L) do not diminish CZP efficacy, and that prior TNFi failure does not predict reduced CZP response.[3]
  • Infliximab + Azathioprine vs. Rifaximin + Azathioprine (J&J / Generic): Prospective cohort of 130 IBD patients demonstrated IFX+AZA is superior for acute TNF-α-driven inflammation control during induction, while RIF+AZA offers superior mucosal healing and oxidative balance, supporting a two-phase induction–maintenance strategy.[10]

**TNF-

Read the full report →

Built on data from

FDAFDA
ClinicalTrials.govClinicalTrials.gov
PubMedPubMed
SEC EDGARSEC EDGAR
CMSCMS
NICENICE
HASHAS
G-BAG-BA
AIFAAIFA
FDAFDA
ClinicalTrials.govClinicalTrials.gov
PubMedPubMed
SEC EDGARSEC EDGAR
CMSCMS
NICENICE
HASHAS
G-BAG-BA
AIFAAIFA
FDAFDA
ClinicalTrials.govClinicalTrials.gov
PubMedPubMed
SEC EDGARSEC EDGAR
CMSCMS
NICENICE
HASHAS
G-BAG-BA
AIFAAIFA

How Pharma Teams Use Our Intelligence

TODO: Use case 1 title

TODO: Use case 1 description.

TODO: Use case 2 title

TODO: Use case 2 description.

TODO: Use case 3 title

TODO: Use case 3 description.

TODO: Use case 4 title

TODO: Use case 4 description.

How It Works

From scoping call to board-ready deliverable in under two weeks.

Step 130 min call

Tell us what you need

Share your therapeutic area, target asset, and the questions driving your investment decision.

Step 25–10 business days

We build your report

Our analysts synthesize data from FDA filings, clinical trials, payer databases, and proprietary sources into a structured intelligence brief.

Step 3

You make better decisions

Receive a polished, board-ready report with clear findings, risk flags, and actionable recommendations.

Every report is reviewed and verified by a domain expert

Our team carries deep biotech and pharma industry experience alongside advanced degrees in chemistry, molecular biology, and economics. No AI-generated filler. Every finding is sourced, cited, and reviewed.

Simple, Transparent Pricing

Choose the engagement model that fits your workflow.

Book a Call to Scope Your Report

No commitment required. We'll scope and quote on the call.

What You Get

Deep Dive

Comprehensive reports

Board-ready intelligence reports on competitive landscapes, regulatory assessments, and funding activity. Custom-scoped to your exact business question. Access to all underlying source data with LLM chat also provided.

10–40 pages

Length

5–10 business days

Delivery

Fully cited

Sources

Monitoring Briefs

Periodic & event-triggered updates

An emerging asset has early readout data at a conference. An FDA advisory committee votes unexpectedly. We deliver a concise, sourced brief so you can act immediately.

1–5 pages

Length

Within 48 hours

Delivery

Conferences, regulatory announcements

Triggers

Why choose Inflection Labs?

Turnaround

Inflection Labs

3-5 days

DIY + AI

Minutes, but needs heavy QA

Big-4

6–12 weeks

In-House

Weeks to ramp up

Biopharma depth

Inflection Labs

Deep. Clinical, regulatory, commercial

DIY + AI

Surface-level, highly prone to hallucination

Big-4

Deep but specialized and narrow

In-House

Depends on hire

Cost

Inflection Labs

From $5K

DIY + AI

Low tool cost, high time cost

Big-4

$50K–$200K+

In-House

$150K+/yr salary

Data sources

Inflection Labs

FDA, CT.gov, PubMed, SEC, HTAs, Patent Repos, Conference Repos

DIY + AI

Public web + LLM training data

Big-4

Interviews + public data

In-House

Varies

Exec Team & Board-ready output

Inflection Labs

Yes. Polished & cited, with easily traceable source data

DIY + AI

Needs extensive editing & fact-checking

Big-4

Yes, but outputs lack adapability

In-House

Varies

Scalability

Inflection Labs

On-demand, any volume

DIY + AI

Fast but inconsistent quality

Big-4

Per project

In-House

Limited by headcount

Frequently Asked Questions

Ready to get started?

Book a 30-minute scoping call, or tell us what you need and we'll get back to you within 24 hours.

Book a Call

We typically respond within one business day. Your information is confidential and will not be shared.